Die meisten Lieder handeln von Liebe. Klar, die ist kompliziert und mysteriös genug, um ausreichend viel Material zu bieten. Mysteriös und kompliziert ist allerdings auch die dunkle Energie – aber darüber gibt es überraschenderweise kaum Lieder.

Der Kosmologe Lloyd Knox hat die löbliche Aufgabe übernommen, das zu ändern. Hier ist sein „Dark Energy Song“:

5 Gedanken zu „Ein Lied über die dunkle Energie“
  1. https://www.climateaudit.org/?p=7272

    KORHOLA, Atte – Leader of the group

    Ph.D., Professor in Arctic Global Change

    I put immediately forward a thesis that I’m glad to expose to public criticism: when later generations learn about climate science, they will classify the beginning of 21st century as an embarrassing chapter in history of science. …

    Proxies have been included selectively, they have been digested, manipulated, filtered, and combined, for example, data collected from Finland in the past by my own colleagues has even been turned upside down such that the warm periods become cold and vice versa. Normally, this would be considered as a scientific forgery, which has serious consequences.


    This series of exchanges was not acknowledged by the IPCC even though it was all peer-reviewed and appeared in the leading journal of the American Meteorological Society. As we have seen before with the IPCC, its review of the literature somehow missed key articles that one of its authors (in this case Trenberth, the lead for the relevant chapter) found to be in conflict with his personal views, or in this case „shameful.“ Of course, there is a deeper backstory here involving a conflict between my co-author Chris Landsea and Trenberth in early 2005, prompting Landsea to resign from the IPCC.

    So almost five years after we first submitted our paper how does it hold up? Pretty well I think, on all counts. I would not change any of the conclusions above, nor would I change the reply to Anthes et al. Science changes and moves ahead, so any review will eventually become outdated, but ours was an accurate reflection of the state of science as of 2005. However, you won’t find any of this in the IPCC.

  2. @Florian: Der Eddy ist halt ein Prediger mit MISSION. Spammt auch bei mir regelmäßig. Das muss man wirklich konsequent löschen. Es bleibt nichts anderes übrig. Sonst sind die Kommentare ganz schnell unlesbar und die Vernünftigen suchen das Weite.

Schreibe einen Kommentar

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind mit * markiert

Diese Website verwendet Akismet, um Spam zu reduzieren. Erfahre mehr darüber, wie deine Kommentardaten verarbeitet werden.